<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Sox Head to Boston After Taking Two at Yankee Stadium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blacksoxblog.com/white-sox-head-to-boston-after-taking-two-at-yankee-stadium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blacksoxblog.com/white-sox-head-to-boston-after-taking-two-at-yankee-stadium/</link>
	<description>From Joe Jackson to Frank Thomas, A Look at the Chicago White Sox, Both Past and Present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:27:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tybor</title>
		<link>http://www.blacksoxblog.com/white-sox-head-to-boston-after-taking-two-at-yankee-stadium/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Tybor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blacksoxblog.com/?p=116#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I think that putting the White Sox on &quot;pace for 106 wins&quot; is a little misguided.  For one, the Sox are only a handful of games over .500 over the last month and a half.  Second, the loss of Frank Thomas limits the offense by about a quarter of a run per game.  Finally, when you consider the expected regression to the mean in their record in one-run ballgames, you have to temper that estimate a bit.  

Monte Carlo simulations of the remainder of the season peg them for 98-99 wins.  I guess if you have any die-hard friends, the percentage play would be to set an over/under of 101.5 and have them pick the over.  Probably an easy $25.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that putting the White Sox on &#8220;pace for 106 wins&#8221; is a little misguided.  For one, the Sox are only a handful of games over .500 over the last month and a half.  Second, the loss of Frank Thomas limits the offense by about a quarter of a run per game.  Finally, when you consider the expected regression to the mean in their record in one-run ballgames, you have to temper that estimate a bit.  </p>
<p>Monte Carlo simulations of the remainder of the season peg them for 98-99 wins.  I guess if you have any die-hard friends, the percentage play would be to set an over/under of 101.5 and have them pick the over.  Probably an easy $25.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

